| HONORS
224G
God and Nature Reading and Discussion Guide Professor William Eamon
|
Evolution or Creation? A Compromise |
Table of Contents
Unit 1.2 Ancient Philosophy and Religion
Unit 1.3 Science and Early Christianity
Unit 1.4 Islamic Philosophy and Science
Unit 1.5 Science and Theology in the Middle Ages
Unit 2.1 The Copernican Revolution
Unit 2.2 Galileo's Life and Scientific Work
Chronology of the Galileo Trial
Unit 3.1 Protestantism and Science
Unit 3.2 The Decline of Orthodox Christianity
Unit 3.3 Deism and Natural Theology
Interlude: Islamic Philosophy and Science
Unit 4.1 Darwinism and Christianity
Unit 4.3 Creationism and Science
Discussion Topics
What is science? What is religion?
- content
- aims
- context
Can religion be scientific?
- content
- aims
- context
![]()
William Blake, Europe a Prophecy
Anthropology and Religion
Theories of religion advanced by anthropologists:
Edward Tylor: Victorian anthropologist, author of Primitive Culture (1871).Primitives have religion, moderns have science. Both perform same function, i.e., to give order and meaning to the world; to explain nature.Religion is like science, in that it emerges from a combination of observation, inference, generalization.
Primitives are animistic, hence they postulate souls to explain things (the data).
Religion is an intellectual phenomenon; but at a ‘childlike’ level; and based upon false assumptions.
Claude Lévi-Strauss: French anthropologist, author of Structural Anthropology (1958) and The Savage Mind (1962)Is religion an explanation of the physical world, the world of nature? Some anthropologists deny this: only of symbolic, emotional world.Religion is science: a science of observable, qualitative phenomena; not of unobservable, quantitative phenomena (modern science).Robin Horton: English anthropologist living in Africa; author of "African Traditional Thought and Western Science"Religion is a science of the concrete.
Defends intellectual status of religion.Distinguishes in terms of context:
Religious explanations operate in a ‘closed’ society, scientific ones in an ‘open’ society.‘Closed’ society: uncritical; no developed awareness of alternatives to established bodies of theory. Prevailing tenets -- because they are never challenged -- assume a sacred status.
But in the 19th century, when the terms of the science-religion debate were set, this was accepted; and hence science always emerged as superior. And the relationship was always seen as one of warfare.Sources and Links
Andrew Dixon White: History of Warfare of Theology With Science in ChristendomThe Genesis Project (creation myths)
Metropolitan Museum of Art: Blake Images Exhibition
Discussion Topics
Ancient Greece:The birth of philosophy (natural philosophy)The displacement of myth by science
Thales and the pre-socratics
In what areas did science displace mythology in ancient Greece? And how successfully?
Resources and LinksDisease: religious versus scientific curesThe investigation of nature led to a new kind of wisdom; but was it superior?Apollo sending a plague; disease randomly roaming the earthDivination and fate: astrology
Hippocrates: Epidemics, The Sacred DiseaseCreation of wise men of a different (scientific) kind, replacing seers?
Hellenistic occult sciences
Magical formulasSophocles
Thessalos of TrallesOedipus RexWhat kind of king was Oedipus?Does Sophocles resolve the conflict he sees between science and religion? Explain why or why not.
Did he act rationally?
Was he being scientific in his search for the murderer?What kind of religion did Teiresius practice?
Does he act rationally?
Is he ‘superstitious’?
Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex web sitePlay the Oedipus Game! (A cool web site to test your knowledge of the play)
The Internet Dictionary of Philosophy (covers all periods)
Discussion Topics
The pagan philosophical tradition: Greece and RomeWhat was ancient religion like?
ritualsEarly Christianity
sacrifices
prayers
Christ as magus
Christ as a healer
Athens versus JerusalemHow did early Christians regard philosophy?
To what extent did they use it? For what purposes?
On Pagan Learning (c. 220 CE)Augustine"What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?" What did he mean?Why did Tertullian think philosophy was dangerous?
The dangers of philosophy:
- Heresy
- Curiosity
Biography: 354-430, native of Carthage. Bishop of HippoThe decline of science in late antiquity
His education
Works: Confessions, City of GodPhilosophy as a handmaid to religion; to be cultivated, but disciplined and put to use.
The dangers of curiosity.
Why does Augustine characterize curiosity as a "lust of the eyes"?On Faith in Things Unseen: (download this text)
Does Augustine subordinate reason to faith?To whom Augustine writing?Why is it rational to believe in such things?What kinds of (unseen) things is it rational to believe in?
- friendship, love, loyalty
- prophecy
their ‘indications’ or signsIs it ‘scientific’ to believe in things unseen?‘indications’, signs in science: evidenceWhat kinds of invisible things in science do we believe in because of their ‘indications’?
cluesWhat do we mean?What was the early Christian attitude toward science?
Was Christianity responsible?
The Bestiary A book about ‘signs’: animals as signs of divine thingsA book about ‘zoology’?
Analogy; creation has a meaning
versus science: what is the scientific ‘meaning’ of creation?
The world view of early Middle AgesResources and LinksThe ‘factuality’ of the bestiary: what is ‘factual’ in it? Are its claims (about animals) meant to be ‘true’ in the same sense that science's claims are true? In what sense then?
Medieval TO maps: portraying the world schematically Examine the T-O maps:
what are these maps intended to portray? do the portray the world realistically or symbolically? in what ways are the T-O maps similar to bestiaries?
Augustine web site: Texts, translations, commentaries, iconography. An excellent and thorough site.
The Tertullian Home Page
The Aberdeen Bestiary Project
Discussion Topics
An Arabic Medical Manuscript |
Resources and Links
Islamic Science
Discussion Topics
Be able to formulate Anselm's Ontological Argument for God's Existence
Resources and LinksThe ANSELM'S ARGUMENT web site is worth looking at.Can you think of any objections you might make to Anselm's argument?From the ARGUMENT web site, read Gaunilon's ObjectionsSt. Thomas AquinasHow does Aquinas argue for God's existence? Is this a variation of Anselm's argument? (See the ARGUMENT web site's summary, Aquinas on Anselm.)Jewish philosophyMoses Maimomides, "Guide of the Perplexed"
St. Anselm
Discussion Topics
Ptolemaic AstronomyResources and LinksSaving the appearances
Epicycles
Nicolaus Copernicus, De revolutionibus (1543) Biography of Copernicus (timeline)Aims and methods of De revolutionibus
Impact of the work: A conservative revolution?
- calendar reform
- the status of mathematics versus physics
The Council of Trent (1545-1564)
Hermenetics and authorityCopernicus and the BibleThe debate over the Copernicanism and the BibleIn what ways, specifically, does De revolutionibus contradict Scripture?The Protestant ReformationReview these troublesome Biblical passages and explain why they are contradicted by Copernicanism:
- References to the stability of the earth (e.g., Psalm 93:1 & Ecclesiastes 1:4)
- References to the sun's motion with respect to the terrestrial horizon (e.g., Ecclesiastes 1:5 & Psalm 104:19)
- The sun at rest (Joshua 10:12-13)
Luther and Science
Nicholas Copernicus Museum
Council of Trent, Canons and Decrees
1564: Born in Pisa |
![]() |
Discussion Topics
Galileo's Conception of ScienceResources and LinksNature written in a ‘great book’: mathematicsWhat was the scientific status of Copernicanism, according to Galileo? Was Copernicanism true or hypothetical?
The ‘orthodoxy of the day’: naive realism in physics, instrumentalism in astronomy (Shea, 123)Galileo and Rome
Why, according to Galileo, is Copernicanism not contrary to Scripture?
- The Reformation and Protestantism
- The Council of Trent
- 1615: Condemnation of Copernicus
Does Galileo reconcile science with religion?
Galileo Project HomepageGalileo Room, Institute and Museum of the History of Science of Florence, Italy
What was the status of Copernican astronomy in 1615?
- proven or hypothetical?
- an improvement over Ptolemaic astronomy?
Letter to Grand Duchess ChristinaWhy did Galileo think he had ‘proven’ Copernican system? On what grounds?
- Galileo's hermeneutical strategy
- why St. Augustine?
Did these ‘proofs’ constitute proof in the philosophical tradition?
The argument:
- meaning of scientia (knowledge) in the Scholastic tradition
- the grounds for proof in the Scholastic tradition
1. Copernicus never discusses matters of faith; physical proofsOn accommodation:
2. His doctrine cannot contradict Scripture if rightly understood
3. The Bible cannot error; but its meaning must be rightly understood
4. Often Scriptural truths are abstruse; hence if one reads it literally, may fall into error
5. Bible written to accomodate plain people
6. Hence, in physics, we ought not begin with Bible
7. Nature, on other hand, is inexorable and does not care if we understand her
8. Bible does not teach physics1. Some doctrines proven; others only plausible or conjectured
2. When conjectured, must bow to Scripture
3. When certain, interpretation of Scripture must accommodate itself to science.Into which category did the Copernican doctrine fall?
How does Galileo accommodate the Joshua passage with a literal reading of the Bible?Resources and LinksWas Galileo’s attempt to reconcile science and religion successful?
How was the Galileo trial used as a symbol in the succeeding centuries? What does it mean today? Interpret the 1857 painting by Cristiano Banti.
The Background: Key Texts Leading up to the Dispute
1543 Copernicus, De revolutionibus 1610 Galileo, Starry Messenger 1615 Galileo, Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina Early Inquisition Proceedings (1616)
1616 Consultants’ report on Copernicanism February Galileo’s audience with Cardinal Bellarmine March Decree of Index on Copernicus March Galileo’s audience with Pope Paul V May Bellarmine’s certificate concerning his conversation with Galileo Interlude — 1616-1623
1623 Death of Pope Paul V; election of Cardinal Maffeo Barberini as Pope Urban VIII 1624 Galileo visits the new Pope 1632 Galileo, Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems Later Inquisition Proceedings (1633)
1633 April Galileo’s first deposition 1633 April Inquisitors’ report on Dialogue 1633 30 April Galileo’s second deposition 1633 10 May Galileo’s defense 1633 June Report to Pope 1633 21 June Galileo’s fourth deposition 1633 22 June Sentence; Galileo’s abjuration
Discussion Topics
Resources and Links
Bertolt Brecht (1898-1956), German dramatist, director, and poet, whose unique, disengaged treatment of social themes and revolutionary experiments greatly influenced modern drama and theatrical production. He was born in Augsburg, Bavaria. Brecht's early plays show the influence of expressionism, the leading dramatic movement at the time. In 1928, with German composer Kurt Weill, he wrote a musical drama, The Threepenny Opera, a satire on capitalism. During this early period in his career Brecht trained actors and began to develop a theory of dramatic technique known as epic theater. Rejecting the methods of traditional realistic drama, he preferred a loose narrative form in which he used distancing devices such as asides and masks to create a historical frame around the action.
Because of his political activities that opposed German dictator Adolf Hitler, Brecht fled from Germany in 1933. He wrote several plays, including Galileo (1938-1939) and Mother Courage and Her Children (1941), which established his reputation as a serious dramatist. In 1948 Brecht returned to Germany and founded his own theatrical company. He also wrote several noted collections of poems.
Brecht’s Galileo (1939)
This is what Brecht said about his play, The Life of Galileo:Read the essay, "Brecht and the Historical Galileo," by William Eamon“I hope this work shows how society extorts from its individuals what it needs from them. The urge to research, a social phenomenon no less delightful or compulsive than the urge to reproduce, steers Galileo into that most dangerous territory, drives him into agonizing conflict with his violent desires for other pleasures. He raises his telescope to the stars and delivers himself to the rack. In the end he indulges his science like a vice, secretly and probably with pangs of conscience. Confronted with such a situation, one can scarcely wish only to praise or only to condemn Galileo.”Bertolt Brecht, 1947Does Brecht condemn Galileo? Why or why not?
Does Brecht apologize for Galileo? Why or why not?
Brecht exhibition web site
Discussion Topics
The Reformation: What is Protestantism? How does Protestantism differ from Roman Catholicism in matters of doctrine?Resources and LinksGod and Nature in the Middle Ages: God cooperating with nature
- The doctrine of salvation
- The authority of Scripture
Protestantism: the radical sovereignty of God
- Aristotelian science: active matter; the integrity of nature
- The condemnation of 1277: nominalism
Luther: righteousness as a gift of God rather than a result of strivingWhy did Luther reject medieval view? (God's sovereignty)Contrast to medieval doctrine of salvation:
- The role of good works
- Aristotle on moral virtue
The 'Protestant' view of nature:
The mechanical philosophy
- Nature as passive
- The creation: ex nihilo
- Nature incomplete: sustained by God
- Nature has no telos
- Radical sovereignty of God implies that nature has no powers
Atomism
Dead nature: Robert Boyle (portrait)
Problems? order out of chaosNewton (portrait)
Gravitation; its problems; nature lifeless, but permeated by GodA God of general providence, not of constant vigilance over nature. Contrast to Reformers' God
Gravity as graceWhy the change?
- different questions (salvation v. a mechanistic view of nature)
- cultural reasons
Selection from Descartes' Discourse on Method
Why does Westfall claim that the 17th century was a 'watershed' in the history of Christianity?Resources and LinksWestfall's examples: Kepler, Descartes, Newton
How does Kepler sustain this conception: idea of ordered cosmos
- A shift away from salvation: focus on God the creator; wisdom of God in the creation
- Elevates nature as revelation of God
Descartes (portrait)
- principles of geometry as rules of creation
- division of universe into triads (Trinity)
Skepticism:
Proof of existence of God: The bedrock of his metaphysics.
- God as a metaphysical necessity.
- No specific Christian features required.
God the Creator/ Sustainer versus God the RedeemerDescartes on wonder:
- repelled by wonder;
- science's purpose to make wonders end;
- compare to early Christian view
Absence of miracles, etc.That God Exists:
How do we know what we think we know? How can we be sure that our ideas correspond to reality? What grounds do we have?Grounds for doubting ideas of corporeal things, perceptions (e.g. heat and cold), etc.
Idea of God: cannot proceed from me alone; Cannot doubt existence of God
The mechanical universe: clockwork metaphors; God as superior artisanDescartes' vortex theory
Mechanical beasts: automata
Humanity: automata plus a brain
Isaac Newton (portrait) What is Newton's conception of God?How does Newton's God differ from the traditional Christian deity?
How is God like space?
According to Newton, what is the relation between God and gravity?
![]()
William Blake, NewtonLeibniz (portrait)
The dispute with Newton: the Leibniz-Clarke debate
Leibniz's views on space and time
Kepler Web Site
Leibniz's Philosophy
Discussion Topics
Does the universe show evidence of intelligent design? Should the scientist look for evidence of intelligent design in the universe?These questions emerged from considerations of the theological implications of the mechanical philosophy. One of the important religious views that resulted was deism, a popular form of religion among 18th century intellectuals. Deists believed in the existence of God on purely rational grounds, but did not give credence to revealed religion or religious authority. An extension of advances in astronomy, physics, and cosmology made during the Scientific Revolution, deism was influential among politicians, scientists and philosophers during the later 17th century and especially during the 18th century, the so-called "Age of Enlightenment," in England, France, Germany and the United States.
The Enlightenment
Why is the 18th century called the "age of Enlightenment"?Who were the philosophes and what did they believe?
DeismWhat is deism?Natural Theology
Does deism involve belief in God? What kind of God?In what ways did Newtonianism and the mechanical philosophy prepare the way for deism?
Who was William Paley?The Refutation of DesignWhat does Paley mean by ‘design’?
Be prepared to formulate Paley's version of the design argument.
David Hume (1711-1776)
Resources and LinksHume and the Edinburgh circleWho was David Hume?Be prepared to explain Hume’s main criticisms of the design argument.Is it possible to have adaptations without design? I.e., are adaptations (e.g., the eye to sight) necessarily 'designed'?Do you think the design argument is valid? Why or why not?
Why did the design argument fall out of favor in modern philosophy?
William Paley
The Hume Archives
This week's seminars will be entirely arranged and conducted by the two teams of students who have signed up for the extra credit assignment. The two teams are:
The teams will determine the subject-matter of each of the two seminars and will give any reading or other assignments to the students in the class.
Team A: Team B: ![]()
Illustration from the `Aja'ib al-makhluqat wa-ghara'ib al-mawjudat (Marvels of Things Created and Miraculous Aspects of Things Existing) composed in the 13th cent. by Zakariya' ibn Muhammad al-Qazwini
Some possible topics for this seminar include:
Resources and Links
History of Islamic Science Web Page
Early Life and Education (1809-1831) |
![]() |
Discussion Topics
Darwin's Origin of SpeciesSpecies concepts:Darwinism and Religion(1) Essentialist (typological): species are ‘types’, universalsTheories of speciation before the Origin
(2) Nominalist: only individuals exist; species fictions
(3) Biological: species are populations which have reality owing to genetic cohesion and shared ecological nicheFixity of speciesCharles Darwin
Evolution: LamarckAs naturalist: the Beagle voyage‘One long argument’
Origins of the OriginWhy does Darwin characterizes The Origin of Species as ‘one long argument’?Objections the the argument of the Origin:Design argument: Why does Darwin reject design?
Why no missing links?Strengths of the theory:
Laws of variation unknownGeographical distribution
Species concept: strongly marked varieties; superiority versus independent creation
Resources and LinksWhat were Charles Darwin's religious beliefs? (See text in website below).What were Darwin's views if the design argument?Adam Sedgwick
Was Darwin an atheist or an agnostic?What were Sedgwick's objections to Darwin's theory (see website below).Thomas Henry Huxley (portrait)What was Huxley's role in the history of Darwinism?Is Darwinism just another religion?
Darwin’s Works online
Adam Sedgwick
Discussion Topics
Background: The Tennessee Anti-Evolution LawResources and LinksJohn Scopes (portrait)
The 'trial of the century'
What were the main issues of the trial?
Who were the protagonists?
What was the trial outcome?
Inherit the Wind What were some of the main political events that inspired the authors to write the play, Inherit the Wind?What were the main political ideas in the play?
Do you think the play is relevant to today? Why or why not?
Scopes Trial Web Page
Discussion Topics
Be able to formulate the main arguments of the 'scientific creationists'.Resources and LinksAre the arguments of the ‘scientific creationists’ scientific?
Are the arguments of the creationists valid?
Can ‘Galileo’s principle’ about science and religion be applied to the science/creationism controversy? Why or why not?
Creation Science home pageNational Academy of Sciences ‘Science and Creationism’ page
National Center for Science Education home page