HONORS 224G
God and Nature

Reading and Discussion Guide

Professor William Eamon
New Mexico State University
Fall 2003


Evolution or Creation?  A Compromise

Table of Contents

Unit 1.1 Introduction

Unit 1.2 Ancient Philosophy and Religion

Unit 1.3 Science and Early Christianity

Unit 1.4 Islamic Philosophy and Science

Unit 1.5 Science and Theology in the Middle Ages

Unit 2.1 The Copernican Revolution

Unit 2.2 Galileo's Life and Scientific Work

Unit 2.3 The Trial of Galileo

Chronology of the Galileo Trial

Unit 2.4 Brecht on Galileo

Unit 3.1 Protestantism and Science

Unit 3.2 The Decline of Orthodox Christianity

Unit 3.3 Deism and Natural Theology

Interlude: Islamic Philosophy and Science

Unit 4.1 Darwinism and Christianity

Unit 4.2 The Scopes Trial

Unit 4.3 Creationism and Science



Unit 1.1 Introduction:
Science, Myth, Religion
 
What is science?
  • content
  • aims
  • context
What is religion?
  • content
  • aims
  • context
Can religion be scientific?

William Blake, Europe a Prophecy
Discussion Topics
Anthropology and Religion
Theories of religion advanced by anthropologists:
Edward Tylor:  Victorian anthropologist, author of Primitive Culture (1871).
Primitives have religion, moderns have science.  Both perform same function, i.e., to give order and meaning to the world; to explain nature.

Religion is like science, in that it emerges from a combination of observation, inference, generalization.

Primitives are animistic, hence they postulate souls to explain things (the data).

Religion is an intellectual phenomenon; but at a ‘childlike’ level; and based upon false assumptions.

Claude Lévi-Strauss:  French anthropologist, author of Structural Anthropology (1958) and The Savage Mind (1962)
Religion is science:  a science of observable, qualitative phenomena; not of unobservable, quantitative phenomena (modern science).

Religion is a science of the concrete.

Robin Horton:  English anthropologist living in Africa; author of "African Traditional Thought and Western Science"
Defends intellectual status of religion.

Distinguishes in terms of context:

Religious explanations operate in a ‘closed’ society, scientific ones in an ‘open’ society.

‘Closed’ society:  uncritical; no developed awareness of alternatives to established bodies of theory.  Prevailing tenets -- because they are never challenged -- assume a sacred status.

Is religion an explanation of the physical world, the world of nature?  Some anthropologists deny this:  only of symbolic, emotional world.
But in the 19th century, when the terms of the science-religion debate were set, this was accepted; and hence science always emerged as superior.  And the relationship was always seen as one of warfare.
Sources and Links
Andrew Dixon White:  History of Warfare of Theology With Science in Christendom

The Genesis Project (creation myths)

Metropolitan Museum of Art: Blake Images Exhibition

Back to Top



Unit 1.2 Ancient Philosophy and Religion

Discussion Topics

Ancient Greece:
The birth of philosophy (natural philosophy)

The displacement of myth by science

Thales and the pre-socratics

In what areas did science displace mythology in ancient Greece?  And how successfully?
Disease:  religious versus scientific cures
Apollo sending a plague; disease randomly roaming the earth
Hippocrates: Epidemics, The Sacred Disease
Divination and fate:  astrology
The investigation of nature led to a new kind of wisdom; but was it superior?

Creation of wise men of a different (scientific) kind, replacing seers?

Hellenistic occult sciences

Magical formulas
Thessalos of Tralles
Sophocles
Oedipus Rex
What kind of king was Oedipus?
Did he act rationally?
Was he being scientific in his search for the murderer?

What kind of religion did Teiresius practice?
Does he act rationally?
Is he ‘superstitious’?

Does Sophocles resolve the conflict he sees between science and religion?  Explain why or why not.
Resources and Links
Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex web site

Play the Oedipus Game! (A cool web site to test your knowledge of the play)

The Internet Dictionary of Philosophy (covers all periods)

Web Resources on Sophocles

Traditions of Magic in Ancient Antiquity


Back to Top


Unit 1.3 Science and Early Christianity

Discussion Topics

The pagan philosophical tradition:  Greece and Rome

What was ancient religion like?

rituals
sacrifices
prayers
Early Christianity
Christ as magus
Christ as a healer
Athens versus Jerusalem

How did early Christians regard philosophy?

To what extent did they use it?  For what purposes?

Tertullian

On Pagan Learning (c. 220 CE)
"What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?"  What did he mean?

Why did Tertullian think philosophy was dangerous?

The dangers of philosophy:

  • Heresy
  • Curiosity
Augustine
Biography:  354-430, native of Carthage.  Bishop of Hippo
His education
Works:  Confessions, City of God

Philosophy as a handmaid to religion; to be cultivated, but disciplined and put to use.

The dangers of curiosity.

Why does Augustine characterize curiosity as a "lust of the eyes"?
Does Augustine subordinate reason to faith?
On Faith in Things Unseen: (download this text)
To whom Augustine writing?

What kinds of (unseen) things is it rational to believe in?

  • friendship, love, loyalty
  • prophecy
Why is it rational to believe in such things?
their ‘indications’ or signs
Is it ‘scientific’ to believe in things unseen?
‘indications’, signs in science: evidence
clues
What kinds of invisible things in science do we believe in because of their ‘indications’?
The decline of science in late antiquity
What do we mean?
Was Christianity responsible?
What was the early Christian attitude toward science?
 
The Bestiary
A book about ‘signs’:  animals as signs of divine things

A book about ‘zoology’?

Analogy; creation has a meaning

versus science: what is the scientific ‘meaning’ of creation?
The world view of early Middle Ages
The ‘factuality’ of the bestiary:  what is ‘factual’ in it?  Are its claims (about animals) meant to be ‘true’ in the same sense that science's claims are true?  In what sense then?
 
Medieval TO maps:  portraying the world schematically

Examine the T-O maps:

  • what are these maps intended to portray?
  • do the portray the world realistically or symbolically?
  • in what ways are the T-O maps similar to bestiaries?
  • Resources and Links
    Augustine web site:  Texts, translations, commentaries, iconography.  An excellent and thorough site.
    The Tertullian Home Page
    The Aberdeen Bestiary Project

    Maps of the Early Medieval Period

    Back to Top

    Unit 1.4 Islamic Philosophy and Science

    Discussion Topics
     
     

    An Arabic Medical Manuscript

    Resources and Links

    Islamic Science

    Arabic Science web site

    Back to Top

    Unit 1.5 Science and Theology in the Middle Ages

    Discussion Topics

    Be able to formulate Anselm's Ontological Argument for God's Existence
    The ANSELM'S ARGUMENT web site is worth looking at.
    Can you think of any objections you might make to Anselm's argument?
    From the ARGUMENT web site, read Gaunilon's Objections
    St. Thomas Aquinas
    How does Aquinas argue for God's existence?  Is this a variation of Anselm's argument? (See the ARGUMENT web site's summary, Aquinas on Anselm.)
    Jewish philosophy
    Moses Maimomides, "Guide of the Perplexed"
    Resources and Links
    St. Anselm

    St. Anselm

    Moses Maimomides


    Back to Top


    Unit 2.1 The Copernican Revolution

    Discussion Topics

    Ptolemaic Astronomy
    Saving the appearances
    Epicycles
        Nicolaus Copernicus, De revolutionibus (1543)
    Biography of Copernicus (timeline)

    Aims and methods of De revolutionibus

    • calendar reform
    • the status of mathematics versus physics
    Impact of the work:  A conservative revolution?

    The Council of Trent (1545-1564)

    Hermenetics and authority
    Copernicus and the Bible
    The debate over the Copernicanism and the Bible
    In what ways, specifically, does De revolutionibus contradict Scripture?

    Review these troublesome Biblical passages and explain why they are contradicted by Copernicanism:

    The Protestant Reformation
    Luther and Science
     
    Resources and Links
    Nicholas Copernicus Museum
    Council of Trent, Canons and Decrees
    Back to Top

    Unit 2.2 Galileo's Life and Scientific Work


    Biography and Timeline
    1564: Born in Pisa
    1589: University of Pisa
    1592: Venice and the University of Padua
    1610: Appointed to chair of mathematics at University of Pisa
    1610: The Starry Messenger
    1611: Goes to Rome
    1611: Becomes member of Accademia dei Lincei
    1615: Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina
    1615: Condemnation of Copernicus
    1632: Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems
    1632: Summoned by Holy Office to Rome
    1633: Trial concludes; exiled to villa in Arcetri
    1642: Died in Arcetri (8 January)

    Discussion Topics

    Galileo's Conception of Science
    Nature written in a ‘great book’:  mathematics
    The ‘orthodoxy of the day’:  naive realism in physics, instrumentalism in astronomy (Shea, 123)
    What was the scientific status of Copernicanism, according to Galileo?  Was Copernicanism true or hypothetical?

    Galileo and Rome

    Why, according to Galileo, is Copernicanism not contrary to Scripture?

    Does Galileo reconcile science with religion?

    Resources and Links
    Galileo Project Homepage

    Galileo Room, Institute and Museum of the History of Science of Florence, Italy

    Back to Top

    Unit 2.3 The Trial of Galileo
    Discussion Topics
    What was the status of Copernican astronomy in 1615?
    Letter to Grand Duchess Christina Why did Galileo think he had ‘proven’ Copernican system?  On what grounds?

    Did these ‘proofs’ constitute proof in the philosophical tradition?

    The argument:
    1.  Copernicus never discusses matters of faith; physical proofs
    2.  His doctrine cannot contradict Scripture if rightly understood
    3.  The Bible cannot error; but its meaning must be rightly understood
    4.  Often Scriptural truths are abstruse; hence if one reads it literally, may fall into error
    5.  Bible written to accomodate plain people
    6.  Hence, in physics, we ought not begin with Bible
    7.  Nature, on other hand, is inexorable and does not care if we understand her
    8.  Bible does not teach physics
    On accommodation:
    1.  Some doctrines proven; others only plausible or conjectured
    2.  When conjectured, must bow to Scripture
    3.  When certain, interpretation of Scripture must accommodate itself to science.

    Into which category did the Copernican doctrine fall?

    How does Galileo accommodate the Joshua passage with a literal reading of the Bible?

    Was Galileo’s attempt to reconcile science and religion successful?

    How was the Galileo trial used as a symbol in the succeeding centuries?  What does it mean today?  Interpret the 1857 painting by Cristiano Banti.

    Resources and Links

    Back to Top


    Chronology of the Galileo Trial

    The Background:  Key Texts Leading up to the Dispute

     
    1543 Copernicus, De revolutionibus
    1610 Galileo, Starry Messenger
    1615 Galileo, Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina

    Early Inquisition Proceedings (1616)

     
    1616 Consultants’ report on Copernicanism
    February Galileo’s audience with Cardinal Bellarmine
    March Decree of Index on Copernicus
    March Galileo’s audience with Pope Paul V
    May Bellarmine’s certificate concerning his conversation with Galileo

    Interlude — 1616-1623

    1623 Death of Pope Paul V; election of Cardinal Maffeo Barberini as Pope Urban VIII
    1624 Galileo visits the new Pope
    1632 Galileo, Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems

    Later Inquisition Proceedings (1633)

     
    1633 April Galileo’s first deposition
    1633 April Inquisitors’ report on Dialogue
    1633 30 April  Galileo’s second deposition
    1633 10 May Galileo’s defense
    1633 June Report to Pope
    1633 21 June Galileo’s fourth deposition
    1633 22 June Sentence; Galileo’s abjuration
    Back to Top

    Unit 2.4 Brecht on Galileo

    Discussion Topics

     
    Bertolt Brecht (1898-1956), German dramatist, director, and poet, whose unique, disengaged treatment of social themes and revolutionary experiments greatly influenced modern drama and theatrical production. He was born in Augsburg, Bavaria.

    Brecht's early plays show the influence of expressionism, the leading dramatic movement at the time. In 1928, with German composer Kurt Weill, he wrote a musical drama, The Threepenny Opera, a satire on capitalism. During this early period in his career Brecht trained actors and began to develop a theory of dramatic technique known as epic theater. Rejecting the methods of traditional realistic drama, he preferred a loose narrative form in which he used distancing devices such as asides and masks to create a historical frame around the action.

    Because of his political activities that opposed German dictator Adolf Hitler, Brecht fled from Germany in 1933. He wrote several plays, including Galileo (1938-1939) and Mother Courage and Her Children (1941), which established his reputation as a serious dramatist. In 1948 Brecht returned to Germany and founded his own theatrical company. He also wrote several noted collections of poems.

    Brecht’s Galileo (1939)

    This is what Brecht said about his play, The Life of Galileo:
    “I hope this work shows how society extorts from its individuals what it needs from them.  The urge to research, a social phenomenon no less delightful or compulsive than the urge to reproduce, steers Galileo into that most dangerous territory, drives him into agonizing conflict with his violent desires for other pleasures.  He raises his telescope to the stars and delivers himself to the rack.  In the end he indulges his science like a vice, secretly and probably with pangs of conscience.  Confronted with such a situation, one can scarcely wish only to praise or only to condemn Galileo.”
    Bertolt Brecht, 1947

    Does Brecht condemn Galileo?  Why or why not?

    Does Brecht apologize for Galileo?  Why or why not?

    Read the essay, "Brecht and the Historical Galileo," by William Eamon
    Resources and Links
    Brecht exhibition web site
    Back to Top

    Unit 3.1 Protestantism and Science

    Discussion Topics

    The Reformation:  What is Protestantism?  How does Protestantism differ from Roman Catholicism in matters of doctrine? God and Nature in the Middle Ages:  God cooperating with nature Protestantism:  the radical sovereignty of God
    Luther:  righteousness as a gift of God rather than a result of striving

    Contrast to medieval doctrine of salvation:

    Why did Luther reject medieval view?  (God's sovereignty)

    The 'Protestant' view of nature:

    The mechanical philosophy Dead nature:  Robert Boyle (portrait)

    Newton (portrait)

    Gravitation; its problems;  nature lifeless, but permeated by God
    Gravity as grace
    A God of general providence, not of constant vigilance over nature.  Contrast to Reformers' God

    Why the change?

    Resources and Links
    Selection from Descartes' Discourse on Method
    Back to Top

    Unit 3.2 The Decline of Orthodox Christianity
    Discussion Topics
    Why does Westfall claim that the 17th century was a 'watershed' in the history of Christianity?

    Westfall's examples:  Kepler, Descartes, Newton

    Kepler (portrait)

    How does Kepler sustain this conception:  idea of ordered cosmos Descartes (portrait)
    Isaac Newton (portrait)
    What is Newton's conception of God?

    How does Newton's God differ from the traditional Christian deity?

    How is God like space?

    According to Newton, what is the relation between God and gravity?


    William Blake, Newton

    Leibniz (portrait)

    The dispute with Newton:  the Leibniz-Clarke debate
    Leibniz's views on space and time
    Resources and Links
    Kepler Web Site
    Leibniz's Philosophy


    Back to Top


    Unit 3.3 Deism and Natural Theology

    Discussion Topics

    Does the universe show evidence of intelligent design?  Should the scientist look for evidence of intelligent design in the universe?

    These questions emerged from considerations of the theological implications of the mechanical philosophy.  One of the important religious views that resulted was deism, a popular form of religion among 18th century intellectuals.   Deists believed in the existence of God on purely rational grounds, but did not give credence to revealed religion or religious authority.  An extension of advances in astronomy, physics, and cosmology made during the Scientific Revolution, deism was influential among politicians, scientists and philosophers during the later 17th century and especially during the 18th century, the so-called "Age of Enlightenment," in England, France, Germany and the United States.

    The Enlightenment

    Why is the 18th century called the "age of Enlightenment"?

    Who were the philosophes and what did they believe?

    Deism
    What is deism?
    Does deism involve belief in God?  What kind of God?

    In what ways did Newtonianism and the mechanical philosophy prepare the way for deism?

    Natural Theology
    Who was William Paley?

    What does Paley mean by ‘design’?

    Be prepared to formulate Paley's version of the design argument.

    The Refutation of Design
    David Hume  (1711-1776)
    Hume and the Edinburgh circle
    Who was David Hume?
    Be prepared to explain Hume’s main criticisms of the design argument.
    Is it possible to have adaptations without design?  I.e., are adaptations (e.g., the eye to sight) necessarily 'designed'?

    Do you think the design argument is valid?  Why or why not?

    Why did the design argument fall out of favor in modern philosophy?

    Resources and Links
    William Paley
    The Hume Archives

    The David Hume page


    Back to Top



    Interlude: Islamic Philosophy and Science
    November 17-19

    This week's seminars will be entirely arranged and conducted by the two teams of students who have signed up for the extra credit assignment.  The two teams are:

     
    Team A:
    Team B:

    Illustration from the `Aja'ib al-makhluqat wa-ghara'ib al-mawjudat (Marvels of Things Created and Miraculous Aspects of Things Existing) composed in the 13th cent. by Zakariya' ibn Muhammad al-Qazwini
    The teams will determine the subject-matter of each of the two seminars and will give any reading or other assignments to the students in the class.

    Some possible topics for this seminar include:

    For further details and suggestions, see the Extra Credit Assignment Guidelines.

    Resources and Links

    History of Islamic Science Web Page

    Islamic Philosophy Online

    History of Science and Technology in Islam

    Back to Top

    Unit 4.1 Darwinism and Christianity


    Biography and Timeline
    Early Life and Education (1809-1831)
    1809:      Born in Shrewsbury, England
    1825-27: Edinburgh University, Scotland
    1828-31: Cambridge University
    Voyage of Discovery: On Board the Beagle (1831-1836)
    1831-36: Serves as naturalist aboard the H. M. S. Beagle
    1835:      Beagle arrives at Galapagos Islands
    1836:      Beagle returns to England
    The Origin of Species and its aftermath (18
    1836-44:  Begins series of notebooks on biology
    1839:       Marries Emma Wedgwood
    1842-44:  Early versions of theory of evolution
    1858:      Essays by Darwin and Wallace to Linnaean Society
    1859:      Publication of Origin of Species
    1871:      Descent of Man
    1882:      Died at age 73

    Discussion Topics

    Darwin's Origin of Species
    Species concepts:
    (1) Essentialist (typological):  species are ‘types’, universals
    (2) Nominalist:  only individuals exist; species fictions
    (3) Biological:  species are populations which have reality owing to genetic cohesion and shared ecological niche
    Theories of speciation before the Origin
    Fixity of species
    Evolution:  Lamarck
    Charles Darwin
    As naturalist:  the Beagle voyage
    Origins of the Origin
    ‘One long argument’
    Why does Darwin characterizes The Origin of Species as ‘one long argument’?

    Design argument:  Why does Darwin reject design?

    Objections the the argument of the Origin:
    Why no missing links?
    Laws of variation unknown
    Strengths of the theory:
    Geographical distribution
    Species concept:  strongly marked varieties; superiority versus independent creation
    Darwinism and Religion
    What were Charles Darwin's religious beliefs?  (See text in website below).
    What were Darwin's views if the design argument?
    Was Darwin an atheist or an agnostic?
    Adam Sedgwick
    What were Sedgwick's objections to Darwin's theory (see website below).
    Thomas Henry Huxley  (portrait)
    What was Huxley's role in the history of Darwinism?
    Is Darwinism just another religion?
    Resources and Links
    Darwin’s Works online

    Charles Darwin website

    Adam Sedgwick

    Charles Darwin's Religious Beliefs

    The Huxley File

    Alfred Russel Wallace page


    Back to Top


    Unit 4.2 The Scopes Trial

    Discussion Topics

    Background:  The Tennessee Anti-Evolution Law

    John Scopes (portrait)

    The 'trial of the century'

    What were the main issues of the trial?
    Who were the protagonists?
    What was the trial outcome?
    Inherit the Wind
    What were some of the main political events that inspired the authors to write the play, Inherit the Wind?

    What were the main political ideas in the play?

    Do you think the play is relevant to today?  Why or why not?

    Resources and Links
    Scopes Trial Web Page

    Inherit the Wind Essay

    Back to Top

    Unit 4.3 Creationism and Science

    Discussion Topics

    Be able to formulate the main arguments of the 'scientific creationists'.

    Are the arguments of the ‘scientific creationists’ scientific?

    Are the arguments of the creationists valid?

    Can ‘Galileo’s principle’ about science and religion be applied to the science/creationism controversy? Why or why not?

    Resources and Links
    Creation Science home page

    National Academy of Sciences ‘Science and Creationism’ page

    National Center for Science Education home page

    National Science Foundation "Science and Creationism" page

    Intelligent Design Network, Inc.


    Back to Top


    Main Page